Eminent domain does not always mean that something physical has been taken from you, like your property, land or access. In previous articles, we’ve discussed regulatory takings in inverse condemnation claims. Regulatory takings arise when a governmental authority has passed some type of regulation, law, or ordinance that deprives the owner of all or part of the value of real estate. A similar scenario relates to unreasonable development restrictions that are imposed upon property owners who wish to develop their property.
What equals an unreasonable development restriction? This occurs when:
- The governing authorities impose restrictions to the extent that the property is not able to be developed in the way that it should be, or
- Development of any kind is entirely restricted because of regulations imposed through the government, like building permits or zoning changes.
If either of these situations occur, a property owner will likely experience a loss of value to their property because they are no longer able to develop it to its highest and best use. Under eminent domain law, a property owner who is faced with unreasonable development restrictions can pursue a court order to reverse this decision and also file an inverse condemnation claim.
» Read more: Inverse Condemnation, Part 4 of 4: Unreasonable Development Restrictions